FEDERAL SEQUESTRATION, HUNGER RELIEF PROGRAMS AND A TRIP TO WASHINGTON, DC
As you've likely heard, sequestration took effect at the start of this month, triggering $85 billion in mandatory spending cuts to a variety of programs.
Washington state will lose an estimated $500 million at a time when we're already struggling to fund programs providing for the basic needs of our most vulnerable neighbors. The programs being cut include:
- The Women Infants and Children's Program (WIC), which provides assistance for low-income women, infants and children under five to purchase food;
|
Due to sequestration our elderly neighbors' food bills will rise while their assistance programs are cut. |
- Senior nutrition and Meals on Wheels;
- Low Income Heat and Energy Assistance Program; and
- Funds that help us safely store and distribute healthy food via The Emergency Food Assistance Program (TEFAP).
These additional cuts will further weaken the ability of these programs to provide real and immediate assistance to those in need.
The bad news doesn't end with the sequester. Other spending programs, including the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP, or federal food stamps), food purchasing for TEFAP, Medicare and Social Security, will not be cut under sequester.
However, they could be cut as part of the ongoing budget debate and in bills such as the Farm Bill, which provides funding for anti-hunger and nutrition programs. We'll keep you up to date as decisions about the funding for these programs moves forward.
While in Washington, D.C. at the beginning of March, I had the opportunity to speak with our Congressional delegation about the importance of preserving funding for these programs to ensure access to food and help lift our most vulnerable neighbors out of poverty. A special thank you goes to Senator Patty Murray for her leadership on sequestration and for working to protect anti-hunger and nutrition programs. While many others in our congressional delegation were receptive and responsive to protecting these vital social safety net programs, it became even more apparent to me that we must all continue to work together to educate our lawmakers about the tangible benefits of these programs, and advocate for their preservation.
Gina Clark
Director of Public Policy
No comments:
Post a Comment